A criminal defense attorney in Miami Dade can explain the serious nature of the charge of dealing in stolen property. This offense is considered a second-degree felony, which carries a maximum penalty of up to 15 years in prison. A criminal defense attorney in Miami Dade can explain that there are certain legal inferences that can apply in these cases. However, these inferences can be rebutted by a criminal defense attorney.

Possession of Recently Stolen Property 

If a defendant is in possession of recently stolen property, there is a legal inference that he or she knows that it was stolen.

Purchase Below Fair Market Value 

Buying property for a price that is substantially below the fair market value also raises the inference that the person knew the property was stolen.

Lack of Ownership Documents

If the person who has the stolen property is a business owner that usually buys or sells the property, the legal inference can arise that the owner knew it was stolen property if he or she does not have ownership documents that are usually kept in the ordinary course of business.

Altered Ignition or Steering Wheel

Having possession of a motor vehicle in which the ignition has been altered or the steering wheel locking mechanism has been broken or bypassed also raises this inference.

Defending Against Dealing in Stolen Property Charges

Although these inferences may arise, an experienced criminal defense lawyer can rebut them. He or she may be able to satisfactorily explain why he or she has the property that does not implicate him or her on a criminal level. A lawyer can analyze the circumstances of your case and determine which defenses to raise in your case.