20th Feb 2017
DNA, although an accepted science, is not always perfect If the lab analyzing it has problems, than it may impact the accuracy of admissibility of such evidence. For instance, in 2015, a Broward County lab was analyzing certain batches of DNA incorrectly. Some of the DNA evidence samples at this local crime lab were found to be improperly analyzed. As a result, the Sheriff’s Crime Lab in Broward County is facing potentially losing its accreditation from the American Society of Crime Lab Directors Laboratory Accreditation Board. So, what effects will this have on Florida criminal law?
DNA and lab results are integral to solving cases for law enforcement nowadays – it wasn’t always so. If you speak to a criminal defense attorney who practiced in the 1980s, you’ll hear about a time when DNA couldn’t be tested. In fact, the first use of DNA to exonerate a defendant was in 1987. That being said, crime labs have to undergo rigorous testing to be able to accurately and effectively analyze the DNA in question – and a false positive can mean the difference between false imprisonment and freedom for a defendant. So, what exactly is happening in Broward County, and what does this mean for defendants?
The Lab Is Still Performing DNA Tests
First of all, the lab is still in business, per se. What this means is, as of yet, the experts did not force the Sheriff’s crime lab to suspend all DNA testing. The lab is still permitted to test isolated samples of DNA, but not evidence containing DNA from more than one person. However, the Broward County Sheriff’s DNA lab lost the appeal, which was rejected by a three-person expert panel. The Sheriff was told that the lab needed to stop testing and producing conclusions regarding mixed DNA, or they would lose their accreditation to test any and all DNA samples.
What Happens If the Lab Fails to Comply?
The lab has since retained an approved laboratory to test mixed DNA samples while they attempt to correct the problem in the next 90 days. If the board is not satisfied with the lab’s corrective measures, it could still lose its accreditation.
What to Expect
Defense attorneys will use this information to try to convince prosecutors that their cases involving DNA, especially mixed DNA, should be dismissed or be extended juicy plea offers. The results of pending cases with DNA evidence will depend on how much other independent evidence exists beyond the DNA that can be used to prosecute the cases. Defendant’s convicted on cases will likely appeal their cases. Again, the results of the appeal will be highly dependent on how much additional non-DNA evidence was used as evidence in the case. Defense lawyers are jumping all over this information and are attempting to have all DNA evidence against their clients thrown out.
If you are facing a case or were convicted in South Florida based on evidence from one of these disputed tests, it may be possible to get that evidence thrown out. Contact South Florida criminal defense attorney Scott B. Saul if you need experienced attorneys to analyze every angle of your criminal charge.
Archives
- December 2024 (1)
- November 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (2)
- September 2020 (5)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (5)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (4)
- August 2018 (4)
- July 2018 (7)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (4)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (7)
- July 2017 (6)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (7)
- November 2016 (4)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (10)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (7)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (8)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (3)
Categories
- Adjudication (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Burglary Crimes (3)
- calendar call (1)
- Car Accident (1)
- Criminal Defense (270)
- Cyber Crimes (7)
- DNA (1)
- Domestic Violence (9)
- Drug Crimes (5)
- DUI (12)
- Embezzlement (1)
- Environmental Crimes (4)
- Expungement Law (2)
- Federal Sentencing Law (3)
- Firearm (3)
- Forgery (4)
- General (82)
- Healthcare (3)
- Immigration (1)
- Indentity Theft (1)
- Insurance (5)
- judicial sounding (2)
- Juvenile Crimes (4)
- Manslaughter (4)
- Money Laundering (3)
- Organized Crime (1)
- Racketeering (1)
- Reckless Driving (3)
- RICO (3)
- Sealing and Expunging (2)
- Sex Offense (1)
- Shoplifting (1)
- Suspended Driver's License (1)
- Traffic (4)
- Trending Topics (1)
- White-collar Offenses (1)