“Danger Hearings” in Florida over VFOS
By : saulcrim | Category : Criminal Defense | Comments Off on “Danger Hearings” in Florida over VFOS
23rd Dec 2019
Defendants on felony probation or community control that are classified as Violent Felony Offenders of Special Concern (“VFOS”) are subject to special rules. A VFOS is required to undergo “Danger Hearings” in the State of Florida if they have violated probation or community control on a criminal charge defined as a violent offense. A “Danger Hearing” in Florida is just one of the other requirements for VFOS.
What Triggers a Danger Hearing?
The following criteria must be met in order to trigger a Danger Hearing in Florida:
- A defendant must be on felony probation for any offense that qualifies the defendant as a VFOS.
- The defendant must be on felony probation or community control and is arrested for a qualifying offense, or
- the defendant is on felony probation or community control and has previously been found by a court to be one of the following:
- a habitual violent felony offender;
- a three-time violent felony; or
- a sexual predator who is arrested for committing a qualifying offense.
Qualifying Offenses
Qualifying Offenses, considered “violent offenses”, that trigger Danger Hearings in Florida can be are any of the following;
- Kidnapping or Attempted Kidnapping,
- false imprisonment of a child under 13,
- Luring or enticing a child.
- Murder or Attempted Murder or Attempted Murder; Attempted Felony Murder, or Manslaughter,
- Aggravated Battery or Attempted Aggravated Battery,
- Sexual Battery or attempted Sexual Battery,
- Lewd or Lascivious:
- Battery or Attempted lewd or lascivious battery,
- molestation,
- conduct,
- Exhibition,
- Robbery or attempted robbery under s. 812.13,
- Carjacking or attempted carjacking under s.812.133, or
- Home invasion robbery or attempted home invasion robbery under s. 812.135.
- Lewd or lascivious offense upon or in the presence of an elderly or disabled person or attempted lewd or lascivious offense upon or in the presence of an elderly or disabled person under s. 825.1025.
- Sexual performance by a child or attempted sexual performance by a child under s. 827.071.
- Computer pornography under s. 847.0135(2) or (3), transmission of child pornography under s. 847.0137, or selling or buying of minors under s. 847.0145.
- Poisoning food or water under s. 859.01.
- Abuse of a dead human body under s. 872.06.
- Any burglary offense or attempted burglary offense that is either a first degree felony or second degree felony under s. 810.02(2) or (3).
- Arson or attempted arson under s. 806.01(1).
- Aggravated assault under s. 784.021.
- Aggravated stalking under s. 784.048(3), (4), (5), or (7).
- Aircraft piracy under s. 860.16.
- Unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb under s.790.161(2), (3), or (4).
- Treason under s. 876.32.
- Any offense committed in another jurisdiction which would be an offense listed in this paragraph if that offense had been committed in this state.
Anyone of the previously listed crimes can be a qualifying offense. If a person has been arrested or convicted of any of those offenses, then the court must conduct a hearing to determine whether that person, who is properly classified as a violent felony offender in Florida, has committed a violation of felony probation or community control.
Violation of Probation or Community Control
The Court’s requirements regarding Danger Hearings in Florida are set out in Section 948.06, Florida Statutes. The court must make a determination regarding the defendant’s violation of probation and community control. No danger hearing is required if the defendant violations probation or community control for any of the following reasons:
- Failure to pay costs
- Failure to pay fines
- Failure to pay restitution
If, however, the VFOS Defendant violates probation or community control for any other reason, then the Defendant must remain in custody until the violation of probation or community control is resolved. In other words, a VFO Defendant is not entitled to a bond before the violation is resolved! As a result, a VFOS Defendant could be sitting in jail for months until resolution. Additionally, the court must hold a Danger Hearing.
Court Requirements
After conducting the hearing, if the court determines that a violent felony offender of special concern has committed a violation of probation or community control other than a failure to pay costs, fines, or restitution, the court shall:
- Make written findings as to whether or not the VFOS poses a danger to the community, based on one or more of the following:
- The offender’s present conduct, including criminal convictions,
- The offender’s amenability to non-incarceration sanctions based on his or her history and conduct during
the probation or community control supervision from which the violation hearing arises and any other previous supervisions, including disciplinary records of previous incarcerations, - The weight of the evidence against the offender.
Any other facts the court considers relevant, - The nature and circumstances of the violation and any new offenses charged,
- The court must also decide whether to revoke the probation or community control,
- If the court has found that a violent felony offender of special concern poses a danger to the community, the court shall revoke probation and shall sentence the offender up to the statutory maximum, or longer if permitted by law.
- If the court has found that a violent felony offender of special concern does not pose a danger to the community, the court may revoke, modify, or continue the probation or community control or may place the probationer into community control.
Why Should You Hire an Experienced South Florida Trial Lawyer?
Hiring a South Florida lawyer that has actual experience in handling Danger Hearings may be the difference between prison and a more favorable result. Remember, if you are found to be a danger to the community in a danger hearing, then you could be sentenced to the maximum punishment allowable!
South Florida criminal defense attorney Scott Saul has handled many of these types of cases. South Florida criminal defense attorney Scott Saul has drafted and argued motions, and successfully handled Danger Hearings in Florida that have resulted in actual dismissals of all charges against clients, or a finding of No Danger.
If you have been accused of this type of crime, call South Florida criminal defense attorney Scott Saul to discuss your case. Let my experience handling these cases help you in preparing your best defense.
Archives
- March 2025 (8)
- February 2025 (8)
- January 2025 (9)
- December 2024 (10)
- November 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (2)
- September 2020 (5)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (5)
- October 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (4)
- August 2018 (4)
- July 2018 (7)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (4)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (7)
- July 2017 (6)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (7)
- November 2016 (4)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (10)
- August 2016 (4)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (7)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (8)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (3)
Categories
- Adjudication (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Burglary Crimes (3)
- calendar call (1)
- Car Accident (1)
- Criminal Defense (304)
- Cyber Crimes (7)
- DNA (1)
- Domestic Violence (9)
- Drug Crimes (5)
- DUI (12)
- Embezzlement (1)
- Environmental Crimes (4)
- Expungement Law (2)
- Federal Sentencing Law (3)
- Firearm (3)
- Forgery (4)
- General (82)
- Healthcare (3)
- Immigration (1)
- Indentity Theft (1)
- Insurance (5)
- judicial sounding (2)
- Juvenile Crimes (4)
- Manslaughter (4)
- Money Laundering (3)
- Organized Crime (1)
- Racketeering (1)
- Reckless Driving (3)
- RICO (3)
- Sealing and Expunging (2)
- Sex Offense (1)
- Shoplifting (1)
- Suspended Driver's License (1)
- Traffic (4)
- Trending Topics (1)
- White-collar Offenses (1)